It's another true/false issue, and how some among us take offense at the
now rather routine confusion over which is which.
DJ
Negativland
>Hrm... it's a funny enough announcement, at least for the first couple of
>paragraphs, but one sort of has to wonder: who exactly will these
>"substantial fines" be paid to? Who exactly has been harmed if a critic
>that doesn't actually exist is said to have really liked something? I mean,
>is somebody out there honestly going to come forward and say that they feel
>cheated out of their twelve bucks because they went to see "Hollow Man" on
>David Manning's say-so and it turned out that they felt violated by the
>experience? Is it really possible to fine or sue somebody for *possibly*
>taking advantage of gullible schmucks?
>
>-me
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------
>Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
>to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
>with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
>----------------------------------------------------
>Rumori list archives & other information are at
>http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
>----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.