It's another true/false issue, and how some among us take offense at the
now rather routine confusion over which is which.
DJ
Negativland
>Hrm... it's a funny enough announcement, at least for the first couple of
>paragraphs, but one sort of has to wonder: who exactly will these
>"substantial fines" be paid to? Who exactly has been harmed if a critic
>that doesn't actually exist is said to have really liked something? I mean,
>is somebody out there honestly going to come forward and say that they feel
>cheated out of their twelve bucks because they went to see "Hollow Man" on
>David Manning's say-so and it turned out that they felt violated by the
>experience? Is it really possible to fine or sue somebody for *possibly*
>taking advantage of gullible schmucks?
>
>-me
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------
>Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
>to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
>with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
>----------------------------------------------------
>Rumori list archives & other information are at
>http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
>----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
"The 'new, new economy' is not about information or the internet or connectivity or content or any of the other standard industry blather, it is about property, as it always is in a class society." - McKenzie Wark