>->>> Another Stupid Argument:
>->>> Is it ok if i come round to your house and take a
>->>> few photographs of you? i
....
>yes, it's stupid. that's libel or slander or defamation, not copyright
>infringement. simple, different, end of story. bye.
>
sorry for my poor phrasing.. i meant 'take' as in steal your photographs,
which you owned, but which also featured you. so it was your property, or
copyright.
but the point has been lost now.
>->>> i still think the principle of
>->>> copyright is fine the way
>->>> it has worked out in practice (not in theory).
>As long as you're willing to continue to be (in theory) an outlaw,
>that's fine. As soon as you in practice become an outlaw, you'll
>probably change your mind.
>
As a 'theory' outlaw, i hold no fears about being sued in practice. i
believe i'm using other people's property when i sample, if they ask for it
back, they have every right to do so.
FG
>smh
>
>Steev Hise, Automagickal Adept
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
N© Detritus.net. Sharerights extended to all.