>
>
>this is the most interesting thing about the mail to Nicola from Rod of
>mp3:
>
>"The bottom
>line: art does not necessarily justify a taking of something that you do
>not own."
>
>Good of Rod to boil it down for us. But oddly enough, for someone in his
>position, that really is the bottom line.
>
Any tracks that get rejected by the copywrite watchdogs on mp3.com are
tracks that I put up at www.besonic.com (who don't recognize samples as
often) and then take advantage of the HTML area of the mp3.com site by
adding a link to my besonic site and saying "get the songs mp3.com rejected"
--
when you reach your peak it's time to die
Death Force: insurgent.8m.com/df
ICQ: 54165457
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori, the Detritus.net Discussion List
to unsubscribe, send mail to majordomoATdetritus.net
with "unsubscribe rumori" in the message body.
----------------------------------------------------
Rumori list archives & other information are at
http://detritus.net/contact/rumori
----------------------------------------------------
"Using the techniques we have presented here, we believe no public watermark-based scheme intended to thwart copying will succeed. Other techniques may or may not be strong against attacks. For example, the encryption used to protect consumer DVDs was easily defeated. Ultimately, if it is possible for a consumer to hear or see protected content, then it will be technically possible for the consumer to copy that content." - 'Lessons from the SDMI Challenge'